QueryDice Hijacker

Introducing the lovely Lauren Roth:

"I’m the assistant publisher of four digital-only imprints of Entangled Publishing, Covet, Brazen, Bliss and Scandalous.I began my career at Simon and Schuster’s Touchstone/Fireside imprint in 2008. Shortly after, I hopped over to the agency side of the business and rapidly climbed the ranks to become a literary agent  at BookEnds, LLC, where I had way too much fun for a person sitting in an office and gained an invaluable perspective on this ancient and ever-evolving industry."

 Lauren kindly accepted my request to join her blog Slushpiletales as a QueryDice Hijacker.  Readers may submit a query and Lauren and/or one of her ninja hijackers will provide a friendly critique of the query.  As Lauren notes, the idea owes its incarnation to the tremendous Ms Janet Reid who runs the chum-chomping Query Shark blog for writers in dire querying straits (as you know, I've been there.  I've no doubt I'll be there again!).

Lauren and her team provide great commentary - and it is a fantastic opportunity to have someone from 'the other side' offer expert opinion on how to move from "meh" to "manuscript, please!"

If you have a finished manuscript and you want to know if your query is pitch-perfect, drop it here.  Have fun and good luck.

Suspense and Thriller Reviewer At Brazen Reads

That was an email that blew me away!

I signed up online at Pam van Hylckama Vlieg's bookalicious and thought no more of it - until Danielle penned me a lovely welcome note a few days ago letting me know I'd been selected to review for Brazen Reads.

Still making up my mind which book to review first - and floored when a trade publisher agreed to my request for Alexander Soderberg's The Andalucian Friend.

I'll try to keep track here of which requests are approved.  If you have a particular book in mind about which you'd like to know more, drop me a line and I'll request it.  No harm in trying.

To Be or Not To Be

The manuscript is out on requested submission with two larger (why is this important - see below) Aussie publishers and a US literary agent tweeted me asking for a query.  A bunch of Aussie school librarians have agreed to provide feedback around the beginning of next month - based on their own and their students' opinions.  So far so good.

Except I'm:

1. doing the equivalent of chewing off my fingernails worrying the publishers won't like it - and then what?
2. not worried if the librarians and the kids don't like it because their feedback is vital - I'll shelve the manuscript and crack on with the other projects I have in mind;
3. wondering if I should take the plunge and do what I wanted to do two years ago - set up my own press - with all the usual caveats:  am I far enough from my own ms to know whether there are any structural or stylistic problems?  And do I want to work on other people's books - yes and no - I just found a really lovely piece of work by an Aussie author who deserves a lot more marketing than he's receiving - I'll be interviewing him on Badass Books in the coming weeks; does my previous corporate work really equip me well enough to do this?
4. knowing that setting up my own press is the equivalent of being canned by the majority and considered unpublishable - BUT the more research I do on this, the more I'm convinced that lack of quality isn't the only reason publishers reject manuscripts.  Henry Rosenbloom of Scribe Publishing in Australia (whom I haven't queried) writes an excellent blog on the state of publishing down under.  One of his articles mentions some extraordinarily depressing statistics - over a 35 year period, despite population growth, circulation of the major Australian newspapers has decreased from between 50 - 86% (for no less than Melbourne's The Age).  That trend is also reflected in the distribution numbers of books.  On the other hand, he also laments the downward spiral in the quality of prose - from straight typographical errors to journalistic bastions of the English language ignoring and printing clobberingly bad syntax.  All of which means you need an editor.  You need an editor.  You need an editor.  I can do this for other people's work - I can't do it for my own;
5. gnashing my teeth because my expat status (from Australia) means I can't enter any of the writing competitions (these are a great way to put your full manuscript in front of people) - and therefore more reason to take the plunge in setting up a private press;
6. fuming because two smaller Aussie publishers already turned me down - not because of the manuscript - rather because being currently domiciled in Singapore means I wouldn't be available to do promotional work - and they decided that without asking me just what I might be willing to do first (you'd think they'd never heard of planes, for instance, or social media networks?!?!).  Since the setting for my ms is Australia, it doesn't translate so well to an overseas publisher - this is high concept fantasy realism, not a dystopia, or off-world adventure.  Another reason to go it alone?

Now you might think that Singapore would be the last place to set up a press.  Hey, I speak Japanese and can squint through a few Chinese characters, but the most Singaporean I can manage is not much, lah!  Because of the government focus on the English language and the majority of young Singaporeans' adoption of US culture (they're rather fond of Australia, Perth in particular, too), there are large numbers of bookshop chains and indie bookstores, a healthy online book-purchasing community, and the Singapore National Library has more outlets per capita than a millipede has feet (meaning that for an island that fits more than twice into Sydney's land area with a population of  around five million, you don't have to walk far to locate your local branch).  Schools are equally thick on the ground - there's one undergoing renovation right behind our estate (no, don't ask about the noise - it's a demolition job on my head as much as the buildings).

This coming Friday we have our we-are-foreigners-not-second-class-citizens-applying-for-permanent-residency interview with the gate-keeping ministry responsible for changing our status.  I'm already eligible to set up my own business - and this will also legitimise a dialogue with the rest of the folks here involved in putting books in readers' hands.

Now if you know all that and you know how distribution and book warehousing, selection into bookstores etc works, doesn't that make the idea of establishing your own wordsmith sound at least a little appealing?

Guest Reviewer

At Badass Book Reviews

I'll still be posting reviews at Goodreads, but some of these will also belong on Badass.  I'll also be looking to interview up-and-coming authors over there.

More later.

Get thee hence

Of all the things that a writer might find cruel, such as a fellow writer stealing your precioussssss ideas, or a review absolutely hating your pride and joy, which might have had the longest gestation period in the history of anything brought into existence, the worst is perhaps when a book review blogger admits to only reading pirated books.

That's like breaking into the bookshop at midnight and helping yourself to the shelves.  Of course you don't actually steal a book - oh no, you sit there with your flashlight devouring stories and when dawn peeks over the horizon, you sneak out of the bookshop.  No harm done, right?

Wrong.

You wouldn't do it because a) the bookshop is alarmed and b) there's an established system of consequences for breaking and entering.

A book is locked until you use a legitimate means for opening it.  Either:

1. pay for it
2. go to the library and borrow it
3. land yourself an ARC
4. download it from www.projectgutenburg.org if it's old or out-of-print; or
5. write to whoever owns the rights of the book and ask for a copy

Do it the way that protects and supports the creators of your enjoyment.  Anything else means you're just a common thief.

When Your Requested Submission is Labelled Spam

You might think having an agent come back to you with a request for your work is the next best thing to your own version of absolute heaven (books, wine, chocolates, Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt or a Caribbean holiday or whatever else represents sublime sensory experience for you).

It's not.

The very first agent I queried came back to me in less than twenty four hours and I emailed back, in all my idiotic inexperience, with the same subject header and a file attachment.  Nothing wrong with that, is there?  After all, that's how you keep track of email conversations, isn't it?

No.  First of all there are a set of rules and the first one (after snagging an agent's attention) is to let them know you are no longer querying but have been elevated to the status of submitting requested material.  How do you do that?  NOT by simply hitting 'reply' and attaching a file.  You change your subject header to 'Requested Materials - BOOK TITLE', attach the file, and then hit 'send'.

Said agent always responds to submitters of requested material.  Said agent posted on said agent's blog almost two weeks ago that said agent has just about finished reading submitted material.  Said agent posted this week that queries are closed and said agent is proud of nine (NINE!!!) new clients.  Said agent is still pining for the elusive middle grade high concept fantasy (THAT'S ME THAT'S ME THAT'S ME).

Said agent's email address for queries is now on auto respond - said agent is closed til January of next year.

Moral to the story: Finish your manuscript.  Spend time on forums learning how to query an agent.  Query agent.  Spend more time on forums learning how to respond to requests for material before sending the requests.  And pray after you send your requested material that an internet goblin doesn't hex it out of existence before the avid agent's eyes alight on it, because woe betide you if you email avid agent asking if avid agent has received the material.  That's akin to labelling yourself rabid internet stalker.

This query business is queer (but not that way)

If anyone ever tells you writing a query is as easy as baking a pie, they are either delusional or referring to when they were kids playing in the mud.  Remember mud pies - dollops of brown sloppy clay and dirt squashed into little round aluminium pie trays and left in the sun to bake?  Not much to that, is there?  It was just the cleaning up afterwards that was always problematic.

Writing a query is the cleaning up afterwards.  After you've breathed a sigh of relief that the last word is digital ink on a screen, that your characters will leave you in peace (for a while), and that you can finally say "I did it!", what's left to do is carve from the block of already hewn wood that is your manuscript a miniature replica.  Rather like condensing the feel of your entire week into one 'tweet'.

When I discovered yesterday that one of the agents to whom I had sent a partial wasn't grabbed by the query but thought there might have been something of interest behind it, which was why she requested a good-sized chunk of the manuscript, the mood-and-motivation barometer plummeted.  So I wrote to the one of the two agents who had rejected me with a personal touch and begged (nicely) for a glimmer, a smidgeon, DAMMIT any shred of insight into whether it was my writing style that was the problem, or the query.

I didn't expect to receive an answer.  But I did.  Ten lines of wisdom and a link to a query the agent had accepted.  So I've been hacking, tossing, re-wording (pulling out my hair and sighing) until I now have something that looks nothing like my query of the last two weeks (which while it drew a few positive responses, let's face it, was drawing an awful lot of negatives), but is a lot simpler.

Is it any better?  I have no idea.  At least when you clean up after baking mud pies you can see the results.  But sending out a query is like stuffing a message in a bottle and hoping whoever finds it understands what the 80 000 words you've now crammed into 140 actually means.

So.  It's now sailing its way through cybersea to dock in the mailbox of five new lucky agents (plus the one who gave me the feedback - hey, there's nothing like persistence, is there?).  The 'no, not interested' replies tend to arrive very fast (there's always an exception to the rule), so by about the end of November I'll know whether this time I've nailed it.

All of which makes the latest email I received a few minutes ago rather ironic - an Australian imprint has just asked for the full manuscript.  And here I've been editing a query all day instead of the book.

*runs screaming from the room*